 |
 |
|
|
 |



WILLIS
LAW FIRM
1221 McKinney
Suite #3333
Houston, Texas
TOLL FREE
1(800)883-9858
1(800)468-4878

|
|
Death on the High Seas Act (DOHSA) - Legal Rights under the Maritime Law
46 USCS Appx § § 761 et seq.
§ 761.
Right of action; where and by whom brought
Whenever the death of a person shall be caused by wrongful
act, neglect, or default occurring on the high seas beyond a marine league
from the shore of any State, or the District of Columbia, or the Territories
or dependencies of the United States, the personal representative of the
decedent may maintain a suit for damages in the district courts of the
United States, in admiralty, for the exclusive benefit of the decedent's
wife, husband, parent, child, or dependent relative against the vessel,
person, or corporation which would have been liable if death had not ensued.
(Mar. 30, 1920, ch. 111, § 1, 41 Stat. 537.)
§ 762. Amount and apportionment of
recovery
The recovery in such suit shall be a fair and just
compensation for the pecuniary loss sustained by the persons for whose
benefit the suit is brought and shall be apportioned among them by the court
in proportion to the loss they may severally have suffered by reason of the
death of the person by whose representative the suit is brought.
(Mar. 30, 1920, ch. 111, § 2, 41 Stat. 537.)
§ 763a. Statute of Limitations-
Death on the High Seas Act
Unless otherwise specified by law, a suit for recovery of
damages for personal injury or death, or both, arising out of a maritime
tort, shall not be maintained unless commenced within three years from the
date the cause of action accrued.
(Pub. L. 96-382, § 1, Oct. 6, 1980, 94 Stat. 1525.)
§ 764. Rights of action given by
laws of foreign countries
Whenever a right of action is granted by the law of any
foreign State on account of death by wrongful act, neglect, or default
occurring upon the high seas, such right may be maintained in an appropriate
action in admiralty in the courts of the United States without abatement in
respect to the amount for which recovery is authorized, any statute of the
United States to the contrary notwithstanding.
(Mar. 30, 1920, ch. 111, § 4, 41 Stat. 537.)
§ 765. Death of plaintiff pending
action
If a person die 1 as the result of such
wrongful act, neglect, or default as is mentioned in section 761 of this
Appendix during the pendency in a court of admiralty of the United States of
a suit to recover damages for personal injuries in respect of such act,
neglect, or default, the personal representative of the decedent may be
substituted as a party and the suit may proceed as a suit under this chapter
for the recovery of the compensation provided in section 762 of this
Appendix.
(Mar. 30, 1920, ch. 111, § 5, 41 Stat. 537.)
§ 766. Contributory Negligence
In suits under this chapter the fact that the decedent has
been guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar recovery, but the court
shall take into consideration the degree of negligence attributable to the
decedent and reduce the recovery accordingly.
(Mar. 30, 1920, ch. 111, § 6, 41 Stat. 537.)
§ 767. Exceptions from operation
of chapter
The provisions of any State statute giving or regulating
rights of action or remedies for death shall not be affected by this
chapter. Nor shall this chapter apply to the Great Lakes or to any waters
within the territorial limits of any State, or to any navigable waters in
the Panama Canal Zone.
(Mar. 30, 1920, ch. 111, § 7, 41 Stat. 538.)
MARITIME
LAW - DEATH ON THE HIGH SEAS ACT
When a seaman dies as a result of an
employer's negligence or because of an unseaworthy vessel, the worker's family
may file for benefits under the Death on the High Seas Act (DOHSA). The
incident must occur on the high seas beyond a marine league (three miles) from
the shore of any state, the District of Columbia, or U.S. territory or
dependency. The decedent's wife, husband, parent, child or dependent relative
may file a claim under the stipulations of the DOHSA. Although
parents and children could recover for wrongful death of seaman working
on surveying vessel under either 46 USCS Appx § 688 or Death on High Seas Act
(46 USCS Appx § § 761 et seq.), these provisions do not preclude remedy
under general maritime law. Spiller v Thomas M. Lowe, Jr. & Associates,
Inc. (1972, CA8 Ark) 466 F2d 903, 20 ALR Fed 89
A plaintiff usually receives damages for pecuniary loss caused
by the loss of the deceased seaman's services. A DOHSA suit must commence
within three
years from the date of the seaman's death. If the decedent's negligent conduct
contributed to the accident (contributory negligence), an award may be reduced
accordingly. In action for wrongful death of crew member, personal
representative could bring general maritime action for wrongful death or
action under 46 USCS Appx § 688 or Death on High Seas Act (46 USCS Appx § § 761-768)
and was not required to make election among theories of recovery. Puamier
v Barge BT 1793 (1974, ED Va) 395 F Supp 1019, 17 UCCRS 745.
DEATH ON THE HIGH SEAS ACT (DOHSA) MAY APPLY TO AIRLINE CRASHES & OTHER AIRCRAFT DISASTERS AT SEA
Death on the High Seas Act, known
as DOHSA, a 1920 statute that has been applied to sharply limit damages
suffered by victims of airline disasters to
economic losses only. DOHSA applies to accidents "on the high seas."
Under current law, DOHSA applies to the Egyptair Flight 990 disaster, which
occurred on international waters, and has been raised as a defense by the
defendants in the TWA Flight 800 and Swissair Flight 111 cases, despite the
fact that those disasters occurred on territorial waters and not on the high
seas. The Alaska Airlines Flight 261 disaster bought light to the use of DOHSA
and demonstrated that application of the law to aircraft which routinely pass
over international waters on domestic and international flights.
TWA flight 800 crashed
just beyond a marine league of New York on take off, killing all aboard.
Among the decedents were many children
whose parents could assert little actual pecuniary loss resulting from their
unfortunate deaths. In response to the public outcry and media attention
focused on airline safety, Congress soon undertook the task of amending DOHSA
to allow recovery for loss of consortium, care and companionship in all cases
of "commercial aviation accidents." This measure passed the U.S.
Congress and became law in April, 2000.On April 5, 2000, a new amendment to
DOHSA became law. The amendment applies retroactively to commercial aviation
accidents which occur after July 16, 1996 (the day before the TWA 800
disaster).
The DOHSA amendment confirms the ruling of the Second Circuit
Court of Appeals in the TWA 800 case that DOHSA does not govern accidents that
occur within 12 miles of the United States shoreline. As a result,
state law remedies, including punitive damages and conscious pain and
suffering, may be recoverable against the airlines and others and not
restricted by the Death on the High Seas Act. The amendment further
provides that for airline, helicopter and other aviation accidents beyond 12
miles, DOSHA applies but additional non-pecuniary damages are recoverable,
which are defined as "care, comfort and companionship." The
amendment does not address whether DOHSA applies on foreign territorial
waters, a matter currently under review in the Swissair Flight 111 disaster
case. The amendment is significant because it ends the arbitrary DOHSA
economic damage limitation in commercial aviation accidents which happen to
occur on the high seas. The families of passengers killed in aviation
disasters will be able to recover damages for non-economic losses and will not
face the prospect of a sharply reduced recovery that the 1920 Death on
the High Seas Act.
Those crashes outside 12 nautical miles from the shores of the United
States will still fall under the Death on the High Seas Act. Under the
amendment however, compensation for non-pecuniary damages will be
allowed in addition to pecuniary damages for commercial crashes. Non-pecuniary
damages will be permitted only for the loss of care, comfort and companionship
in death actions arising from commercial aviation accidents. Commercial
aviation involves transport "for compensation or hire." Thus where
persons are killed in "commercial" accidents on the high seas
(typically the airline, commuter and charter passengers) the culpable
defendants may be forced to pay non-pecuniary damages on top of pecuniary
damages.
OHSA - HELICOPTER & PRIVATE AIRCRAFT
General
aviation accidents on the high seas involving corporate aircraft
and privately owned aircraft are excluded. Helicopter flights over
water that do not involve compensation or hire, will not be covered by the
amended DOHSA. Similarly, public-use aircraft accidents and military aircraft
accidents are still subject to the harsh limitations of the 80-year-old Death
on the High Seas Act, whereby only pecuniary damages can be recovered.

|
|
 |
If you have been seriously injured while as a member
of the crew of a boat, jack-up rig, tug boat, barge or other marine
ship or vessel, then call us for a Free Confidential Consultation.
Talk to Board Certified Personal Injury Trial Lawyer with over
20 years of experience. (Click Here)

|

If I am injured on a ship, should I give a statement
to my employer ? When should I file a notice of injury report ? Under
the Jones Act, do I have the right to choose my own medical doctor ?
(Click Here)

What does maintenance and cure mean
under the Jones Act ? Under what circumstances can I recover pain & suffering
and loss wages under the Jones Act ? (Click
Here)

What
does it mean for a ship to be unseaworthy ? Under the Jones Act can part
of the ship or vessel be seaworthy and another part unseaworthy? (More)

Under the Jones Act and maritime law, what is the
deadline or Statute of Limitation to file a claim or lawsuit if I was
injured on a ship or vessel ? (More)

What if I am not a Jones Act seaman, but I was injured on a ship, vessel or an offshore oil rig or platform ? Does maritime law still apply ? Can I file a maritime claim or lawsuit to recover for my injuries? (More)

Can I file a Jones Act claim if my loved on has been diagnosed
with asbestos lung cancer or mesothelioma from asbestos exposure while
working on a ship or at the shipyard ? (More)
Does maritime law protect me if I was exposed to benzene and later I am
diagnosed with leukemia ? (More)

What if my spouse is killed while at sea? Does the Death
on the High Sea Act (DOHSA) apply to all deaths on ships vessels, helicopters,
and
ships on the high seas?
(More DOHSA info)

What are my legal rights if I have had a previous or old injury but now I have suffered a new injury to my back and neck and may need surgery but the Maritime Insurance company's adjuster says I am not covered and he will not approve it ? Yes, you are covered whether it is aggravation of a old injury or new one, if you were a Jones Act seaman injured on the vessel and the employer was at fault or negligent then you can file a Jones Act lawsuit for any type of injury such as heart attacks, strokes, head injury, brain damage, paralysis, burns, broken bones, paraplegia, quadriplegia, loss of an arm or leg, blindness and for emotional trauma or mental anguish, disfigurement, medical expenses and for loss wages or lost earnings in the past and future.
(Jones Act Lawsuit Damages) |
 |
 |
|
NOTE: The statements and information provided on this web site are for the informational purposes only. This site is not intended to provide legal advice to the reader and NO attorney-client relationship shall be deemed to arise from the receipt this page and/or its associated pages or any oral or e-mail communication to or from with David Willis or The Willis Law Firm. There will be NO lawsuits filed, claims made, letters or phone calls made for a prospective client, until that person is represented by the firm. An attorney client relationship only arises after the attorney and client have signed a written attorney client agreement, after the attorney has evaluated the background facts provided and has accepted the representation of the client's legal action.
Mr. Willis is a licensed attorney in New York and Texas. Principle office is Houston, Texas.
He is a Board Certified in Personal Injury Trial Lawyer, certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.
Mr. Willis has represented clients in maritime personal injury, barge accidents, boating accidents, transports, crew boats, diving accidents, rig workers, injuries in river, lakes, canals, ICC, wrongful death lawsuits, oilfield accidents, oilrig accidents, tankers, shrimp boats, fishing vessels, tug boats, push boats, auto accident, explosions, crane accidents, rollover, asbestos, mesothelioma, sandblasters disease - silicosis, benzene solvents-aml leukemia, MDS, toxic chemical, lung cancer, 3rd party actions, electrical shock, fires, burns, explosions, helicopter crashes, tugboats, trucking accidents, third party lawsuits, and other product liability and negligence cases from across the United States, including clients from Alabama, Arkansas, Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Virginia, Mexico, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, North Carolina, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, West Virginia & Wyoming.
Further, any statement or reference to past personal injury, products liability lawsuits, settlements or verdicts should NOT be relied upon in one's own case or in your decision on which law firm to hire. All cases, facts, injuries, damages, venues and lawsuits are different and there is NO way to predict the outcome of a particular case, verdict of a jury or judge or the strength of a case before a judge, jury or the appellate court system. The client is responsible for all of their own medical expenses. All cases are handled on a contingent fee basis. No attorney’s fees or case costs charged to client, unless a recovery is made for the client. Often in very serious and catastrophic maritime injury and offshore seaman injury cases Mr. Willis may associate with another attorney as co-counsel and in other matters, the case may be referred. In cases where a legal matter is referred, Mr. Willis will continue to maintain joint responsibility with the handling attorney or lead counsel and actively monitor the progress and development of the case |
|
|
 |
|